The Law Offices of Dr. Michael M. Wilson M.D., J.D. Click here to connect to our office instantly
Understand the breakdown of a medical malpractice claim Learn how having an attorney who is also a physician can make all the difference Fill out our free consultation form and get started today
Washington DC Medical Malpractice Lawyer
Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Follow us on LinkedIn
Subscribe to our blog feed
 Follow us on Google Plus
Medical Malpractice Blog
Areas of Practice
Bile Duct Injuries
Birth Injuries
Hospital & Doctor Negligence
Surgical Errors
Medication Errors
Diagnosis Errors
Spinal Cord Injuries
Contact Us

What Professional Standards Apply to Physicians in Malpractice Cases?

The plaintiff brought her husband to the hospital for shortness of breath. Upon examination by a physician, the husband was not admitted — he was sent home with instructions to see a pulmonary specialist. He died two days later while in the ambulance on his way back to the hospital from respiratory failure related to blood clots in his lungs.

The plaintiff did not ask for specific monetary damages, rather she wanted the jurors to set a precedent and send a message to the hospital and its staff. In order to have found the defendants liable, the jury had to determine that the physician's treatment of her husband was below the professional standard of care for emergency room physicians.

The doctor had ordered lab tests, an EKG, chest X-rays, a stress echo test, reviewed a CT angiogram administered to the husband two weeks prior and then consulted with a pulmonary specialist before he sent the husband home. The wife claimed that a second CT angiogram should have been done to check for blood clots. The defendant presented expert testimony that a second CT scan within such a short time period contains health risks to the patient that were not considered appropriate. The defendant alleged that when the husband was released, there were no indications he was gravely ill and his vital signs were normal.

This was a very difficult case to decide. The jury in a 7-1 verdict ruled that the hospital and physician had acted properly in their treatment of the husband and found no negligence in his treatment.

If you know of someone who has been in a situation where there may have been medical malpractice, you need to see a professional in medical malpractice to determine the facts and issues of your case.